Social rights of employees in the workplace essay
Equitable employers outpace their competitors by respecting the unique needs, perspectives and potential of all their team members. As a result, diverse and inclusive workplaces earn deeper trust and more commitment from their employees. Diversity and inclusion are two interconnected concepts—but they are far from interchangeable. Diversity is about representation or the make-up of an entity.
We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
How Social Media Can Affect Privacy and Employment
What are human rights? How do they relate to the economy? Why are they a powerful tool for systemic transformation? Here, you can find short, digestible answers to commonly asked questions about human rights and the economy. Economic, social, and cultural rights or ESCR are a type of human rights that guarantee us the conditions we need to live a life of dignity—where everyone can achieve wellbeing, realize their potential, and have the opportunity to find happiness and fulfilment.
They include a range of protections and entitlements, such as:. The right to an adequate standard of living, which among others includes aspects such as food security, adequate housing, and access to clean water and dignified sanitation.
The right to health, which includes guarantees such as access to healthcare, healthy environmental conditions, and protection against epidemic diseases. The right to education, which includes the obligation to provide free and compulsory primary education, and accessible secondary and higher education, among other aspects. Cultural rights, which includes the right to participate in cultural life and to share in and benefit from scientific advancement.
Human rights are a multidimensional concept. As moral claims, human rights give force to universal values such as dignity, equity, and justice. They assert that there are certain needs—including material needs—that are so essential for human beings to flourish that they must be guaranteed to all.
For these reasons, recognizing economic, social and cultural rights as human rights helps to highlight that poverty and inequality are neither inevitable nor natural.
They arise from deliberate political decisions and policy choices—decisions and choices that policymakers and public officials must be held accountable for. Just like civil and political rights such as freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and the right to a fair trial , economic, social, and cultural rights are part of the body of international human rights law. This means they also give individuals legitimate claims against state and non-state actors when they fail to uphold the protections and entitlements that these rights guarantee.
Similarly, the right to decent work may be impossible to enjoy if you are not allowed to meet and assemble in groups to discuss work conditions. This means, essentially, that human rights come as a package, so cannot be cherry-picked.
This reflects a much more compelling and accurate vision of our intertwined lives, societies and economies. To meaningfully ensure that we can all enjoy our human rights—in particular economic, social, and cultural rights—we have to overhaul the dominant economic system.
It demands an active role for government in providing public goods and essential services that deliver for everyone, not just those who can pay; in mobilizing resources for this purpose, including through responsible government borrowing; in redistributing resources to support the care work performed in households, including through comprehensive social protection schemes; and in regulating the conduct of the private financial and non-financial sector to protect the rights of workers, consumers, and communities affected by their business.
This position should be understood in a political context in which ESCR were under attack on several fronts: they were demonized as a threat to the liberal political order, on the one hand, and dismissed as being too vague and aspirational to be enforced, on the other. But, in an effort to defend economic and social rights—to make them palatable to countries with both a neoliberal or a more social democratic orientation—the human rights community ceded a lot of political ground.
The legacy of this position is a still commonly held belief that governments deserve a much wider margin of discretion in economic policy making than they do in other areas.
But there can be no doubt that the way our economies are designed can make it easier or harder to realize rights. Plus, the human rights framework does contain very relevant principles and standards to guide economic policy. Rights realization is inextricably linked to the particular economic model in place. We see human rights as an inherently redistributive, egalitarian agenda. But, to tap into the potential of this agenda, we need to take a holistic approach to rights.
Such an approach shows how poverty and inequality are both a cause and a consequence of human rights violations. It unpacks the economic system—how it works, what is wrong with it, and what can be done to change it. It specifically connects the dots between—and attributes responsibility for—unjust distributions of political and economic power and unjust distributions of the infrastructure, goods, and services necessary to realise rights.
In particular:. Rights provide a holistic picture of wellbeing. Many actors interpret human rights narrowly, as being mainly about civil liberties.
But they are far more holistic than that. Rights provide a widely agreed language to talk about the values that should underpin our economies. Intuitively, universally, demonstrated by the practice of everyday struggle, we know that people ought to be free from hunger; to be able to choose their own government; and to enjoy all the other conditions for human flourishing.
These values are codified in a comprehensive framework of binding standards and principles. These have been agreed by the vast majority of governments.
Rights create legal obligations that governments and other powerful actors must comply with. Ensuring that all people can enjoy their human rights on an equal footing demands action to redistribute resources, remedy inequalities, and rebalance power.
Learn more about how to advance justice through a Rights-Based Economy here. Human rights are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , as well as in numerous international treaties and regional conventions that have been widely ratified by governments around the world.
The Declaration did not make a distinction between civil and political rights and ESCR, recognizing both equally. Economic and social rights are also included in numerous other international and regional human rights instruments, including those setting out the rights of particular groups.
ESCR are also widely recognized in domestic legal systems. Although not always to the same extent as civil and political rights, there are a number of ways that national constitutions and legislation can and do address ESCR. This includes through prohibitions on discrimination, whether for employment, housing, or service delivery. These rights guarantee much more than a minimum level of basic subsistence. In other words, they set a floor, not a ceiling.
They demand continuous improvement and must be guaranteed for all, prioritizing the needs of disadvantaged groups facing systemic and intersectional forms of discrimination.
ESCR are not open-ended, aspirational goals to be achieved at some undefined time in the future. They set out the protections and entitlements that people should be able to expect in a society that guarantees their rights. They also set out what governments must, and must not, do to deliver on those guarantees. A helpful distinction made is between obligations of conduct what governments must do and result what governments must achieve.
Resource allocation: i. Importantly, government obligations do not stop at their own border. They extend to guaranteeing the rights of people abroad affected by their conduct, including when they act as members of international organizations such the International Monetary Fund or World Trade Organization. These are known as extraterritorial obligations. Human rights treaties are signed by—and enforced against—governments.
The obligation to protect rights means taking action to prevent, investigate, and punish human rights abuse committed by other actors—including businesses. This includes regulating the real estate market and enacting a living minimum wage, for example. These state that companies must respect human rights.
To date, implementation of the Guiding Principles has been slow. Currently, an important process is underway to agree on a treaty which would impose binding human rights obligations on businesses.
There are a number of ways that international human rights law can also apply directly to the international financial institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank:. Institutions that are specialized agencies of the United Nations must comply with the human rights provisions in the United Nations Charter. Elements of human rights law—in particular the Universal Declaration on Human Rights—have become part of customary international law.
The scope of the human rights obligations that apply to international financial institutions may be more limited than for governments given its more limited mandate and powers. Loan conditions that constrain fiscal space, regressive policy advice that fails to assess social impacts, and onerous debt burdens that squeeze public budgets are examples of such interference. The concern raised by some jurists and legal scholars was that these rights are too vague for judges to determine whether or not they had been violated.
But there are now countless examples of courts around the world applying domestic and international law to protect ESCR. The Optional Protocol establishes mechanisms for hearing individual complaints, for inter-State communications and for addressing grave or systemic violations of ESCR. It came into force in May Accountability is a cornerstone of the human rights framework. It has both a corrective and preventative function. It addresses individual and collective grievances and sanctions wrongdoing, on the one hand.
It also helps improve policymaking and service delivery, on the other. But our ability to hold states to account for their commitments to realize economic and social rights has been weakened by several factors. The exact scope of state obligations—and how these play out in economic policy—are often contested.
Major shifts in the globalized economy have led to a proliferation of actors above, below, and beyond the state, all of whom impact on the realization of economic and social rights. This, in turn, makes it less clear who should be responsible for what. This leaves people whose economic and social rights deprivations have been harmed with fewer channels to seek redress.
For human rights to advance economic justice, international norms must be translated into well-defined standards, against which the policies of states and other actors can be judged. Strengthening the enforcement of ESCR by local, national, regional or international accountability mechanisms, whether they be formal or informal, claim their rights is also critical. In practice, governments around the world routinely flout their human rights obligations.
The policy trends that have accompanied the spread of neoliberal globalization include the commodification, privatization and financialization of public goods and essential services. The role of government in public provisioning has been drastically reduced in many contexts—often at the behest of international financial institutions. Even in the pandemic, the World Bank is still financially supporting the private health sector instead of strengthening public health systems, for example.
These trends are symptoms of the deeply entrenched narrative that the free market is better equipped than the state to distribute resources in the economy efficiently. This narrative is underpinned by the repetition of powerful metaphors e.
Despite mountains of evidence proving it false, this narrative has stuck. The human rights community has, for the most part, struggled to effectively contest this narrative. For many, economics is perceived to be both too technical and too political. Instead, the focus has been on addressing concerns related to policy making such as transparency and anti-corruption by strengthening formal accountability channels. But, to tackle the root causes of human rights violations, we have to move from addressing symptoms to interrogating systems.
Understanding the configurations of power that have enabled this system is an essential precondition for changing them.
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it. Type of paper: Essay. The importance of social media websites is constantly increasing. Now they play a significant role in the daily life of every individual. Businesses are also involved in the social media, as these websites represent many opportunities for them, such as advertising, promotion, customer relations, receiving feedback, and etc. Due to the significant importance and time consuming of social networks, there appeared many issues related to them, e.
Labour Law: Why we need it?
Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. E-mail: moc. It is increasingly being recognized that the mental health of employees is a crucial determinant in their overall health and that poor mental health and stressors at the workplace can be a contributory factor to a range of physical illnesses like hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular conditions, amongst others. In addition, poor mental health can also lead to burn-out amongst employees, seriously affecting their ability to contribute meaningfully in both their personal and professional lives. Data from different countries around the world indicate that mental health problems are a cause of a number of employees dropping out of work. Mental health problems have an impact on employers and businesses directly through increased absenteeism, negative impact on productivity and profits, as well as an increase in costs to deal with the issue. Work-related stress is a major cause of occupational ill health, poor productivity and human error.
Creating the Best Workplace on Earth
Labor rights or workers' rights are both legal rights and human rights relating to labor relations between workers and employers. These rights are codified in national and international labor and employment law. In general, these rights influence working conditions in relations of employment. One of the most prominent is the right to freedom of association , otherwise known as the right to organize. Workers organized in trade unions exercise the right to collective bargaining to improve working conditions.
5 Benefits of Diversity in the Workplace
Diversity in the workplace means the acceptance and inclusion of employees of all backgrounds. A diverse workplace is an important asset, since it acknowledges the individual strengths of each employee and the potential they bring. Valuing the differences of others is what ultimately brings us all together and can be the secret to a successful, thriving workplace and a fair work culture. Workplace diversity means respecting and valuing the skills and differences that each staff member brings into the workspace. A diverse workplace is an inclusive environment that provides equal rights and opportunities for all workers, regardless of gender, colour, age, ethnicity, physical ability, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, and so on. In Australia, it is law for workplaces to provide equal opportunity to their employees, as well as to create a workplace free from discrimination and harassment.
Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin is a 'toxic' workplace, some current and ex-workers claim in essay
That applies to fairness in wealth, opportunities, basic needs, and more. We have compiled 10 reasons why everyone should care about social justice:. Take a free course on Social Justice by top universities. When it comes to what is fair, everyone is owed basic things. Access to food, shelter, and clean water are the big three. In certain societies, these are often taken for granted among the majority of the population, but there are always gaps.
Social workers are passionate about serving others. They apply this passion to advocating for vulnerable groups of people like children, seniors and those with disabilities. Because of this, social work is tied to social justice, which often leads efforts to protect the rights of the previously mentioned groups. Social justice has to do with the belief that all people should have equal rights and opportunity.
This restores sense of fairness and justice in society. Economic penalties fail to serve as an effective deterrence and lead to loss of faith in criminal justice system. Unions protect the job security of lower level employees and many are able to find similar jobs within a short period of time. This ensures that no innocent party suffers, and the corporation ultimately gets punished. However there should be some protection given to the employer not to make them accountable in such cases. The applications….
Section 13 also concerns the right to strike. It reads as follows:. Nothing in this Act, except as specifically provided for herein, shall be construed so as either to interfere with or impede or diminish in any way the right to strike, or to affect the limitations or qualifications on that right. It is clear from a reading of these two provisions that: the law not only guarantees the right of employees to strike, but also places limitations and qualifications on the exercise of that right. See for example, restrictions on strikes in health care institutions set forth below.
Legal rights of employees are determined by existing legal norms and written laws. Moral rights of employees do not have material or legal manifestations. Instead, moral laws have cultural implications.
Steer!
You have quickly thought up such matchless phrase?